Creative Commons (CC) licenses are designed for creative works—text, images, data, documentation, music, video—rather than software code. For researchers, these are often more relevant than software licenses because they apply to datasets, papers, educational materials, and other non-code outputs.
Software vs Creative Works¶
| Aspect | Software Licenses (MIT, GPL) | Creative Commons |
|---|---|---|
| Designed for | Source code, binaries | Creative works, data, media |
| Concerns | Compilation, linking, derivatives | Copying, adaptation, distribution |
| Patent provisions | Sometimes | No |
| Source code concept | Central | Not applicable |
Don't use CC for software
Creative Commons explicitly recommends against using CC licenses for software. Use MIT, Apache, or GPL instead. CC licenses don't address software-specific concerns like source code, compilation, and linking.
The Building Blocks¶
Creative Commons licenses are modular. They combine four conditions:
-
Attribution (BY)
Must credit the creator. Present in all CC licenses except CC0.
-
ShareAlike (SA)
Derivatives must use the same license. The "copyleft" of Creative Commons.
-
NonCommercial (NC)
No commercial use allowed. Not considered "Free Culture" or open source.
-
NoDerivatives (ND)
No modifications allowed. Not considered "Free Culture" or open source.
The Six Licenses¶
These elements combine into six standard licenses, from most to least permissive:
| License | Allows Commercial | Allows Derivatives | Requires ShareAlike |
|---|---|---|---|
| CC BY | Yes | Yes | No |
| CC BY-SA | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| CC BY-NC | No | Yes | No |
| CC BY-NC-SA | No | Yes | Yes |
| CC BY-ND | Yes | No | — |
| CC BY-NC-ND | No | No | — |
Plus CC0, which waives all rights (public domain dedication).
The Spectrum¶
More Free Less Free
◄─────────────────────────────────────────────────────►
CC0 ─── CC BY ─── CC BY-SA ─── CC BY-NC ─── CC BY-ND ─── CC BY-NC-ND
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │
No Credit Credit + Credit + Credit + Credit +
rights required share-alike no money no changes no money +
no changes
Permissive vs Copyleft in CC¶
The same philosophical divide exists in Creative Commons:
- CC BY is permissive—like MIT for creative works
- CC BY-SA is copyleft—like GPL for creative works
- NC and ND are restrictions that don't exist in OSI-approved software licenses
Common Use Cases¶
| Work Type | Common Choice | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Research data | CC0 or CC BY | Maximum reuse, citation norms provide attribution |
| Documentation | CC BY or CC BY-SA | Allow adaptation, encourage sharing |
| Educational materials | CC BY or CC BY-NC | Depends on commercial concerns |
| Photographs | Varies widely | Photographers often want ND or NC |
| Academic papers | CC BY | Open access standard |
Version Matters¶
Creative Commons licenses have versions. Always use version 4.0, the current version, which:
- Works internationally without "porting"
- Covers database rights (important for data)
- Has clearer language
- Addresses moral rights
Earlier versions (1.0, 2.0, 3.0) had regional "ported" versions and lacked some protections.
The "Free Culture" Subset¶
The FSF and Creative Commons distinguish between "Free Culture" licenses and others:
Free Culture approved: - CC0 - CC BY - CC BY-SA
Not Free Culture: - CC BY-NC (restricts use) - CC BY-ND (restricts derivatives) - Any combination with NC or ND
For maximum openness and reuse, choose from the Free Culture subset.